How is the ‘Voyage’ progressing?

Sailing is an excellent metaphor for our lives, where the wind and the sea constitute the reality of our lives.

It may be for some of us, we stay close to shore, perhaps even choosing not to venture out of the harbour (yet).

Our ‘yacht’ is the ‘Self’ we created / built. If you like it is the ‘Self’ we learned / we were taught.

We are the sailor in charge of this ‘yacht.’

What starts to become apparent after we leave the harbour and set our course is, the more we respond to the wind and the waves, rather than react and try to ‘force’ our way forward, the more we begin to understand what the ‘yacht’ really needs us to do, in order to follow the course.

For example tacking, because that’s what the conditions demand – we cannot go straight there. What we also begin to realise is: ‘Oh its me, I’m in charge of this ‘yacht’, where it’s going and how well or badly it’s going to navigate there.’

We cannot make demands of the winds and waves to follow our bidding, we can only respond to what is.

This may also trigger us into thinking, perhaps this ‘yacht’ / ‘Self’ could use some design tweaks.

What are those?

How shall I incorporate them?

As we begin to recognise the ‘power’ of responding, we learn to let go of a lot of what we thought was required in life / what we learned.

Then we begin to unlearn and relearn, this time though with an inner wisdom that says all we can control is our attitude and our response.

Thus we learn to be at one with who we are and the fluidity of the life we have.

Life is 10% what happens and 90% how we deal with it.

Show up, connect, respond to what shows up.

As you think about being the one in control of your ‘Yacht.’

  • What are you doing well?
  • How clear are you  on what needs to improve?
  • What’s missing on the voyage?

Can a Haiku perhaps help?

 

In the journey of you becoming you, or me becoming me, it is often small insights that trigger shifts and changes within us.

I have begun to capture some of those, in the Japanese poetic form of Haikus, consisting of 3 lines, 5 syllables in the first line, 7 in the second line and 5 in the third line.

The discipline of Haiku writing helps to really focus on the message.

This is my haiku book

 

How do you Lead? Learn to Lead through Influence not Dominance

Learning to lead through influence, not dominance.

So often leadership is confused with hierarchy — a structure which suggests there is scarcity at the top. To progress up, someone must come down. It’s an industrial mindset, and when applied to leadership it is simply not true.

Heath Evans
Jan 22, 2019 · 5 min read

We see these power struggles every day. Struggles for status to determine who will speak first, and more importantly who will speak last (aka the final say).

Often the outcomes of these interactions are mistaken for influence, but more commonly they are determined by dominance. The person who spoke the loudest, who pushed the hardest, who ‘pulled-rank’ when they were tired of pretending they wanted collaboration when ultimately they wanted consensus.

It’s an easy trap to fall into, but it is neither sustainable nor respectable and there are many leaders shining the light on a better way.

Gaining influence through empowerment.

The greatest leaders I’ve ever worked with have never relied on dominance to gain influence — instead they’ve been willing to dance with it.

They’ve encouraged those around them to take turns. To take the lead and feel what it would be like to take responsibility and determine the next step.

They’ve provided the parameters, but within those boundaries they encouraged us to explore the edges. To bring our creativity, our imagination, and to try things that have never been done before, always eager to help us should we ever lose our way.

When a leader has done this fully, never once did I lose sight of the fact that they were ultimately in charge (a fear that holds back many managers from fully committing to this approach). Instead, through their trust and generosity, I felt I was seen, I was heard, I mattered, I was valued, and ultimately I capable of more than I had ever imagined.

I felt this not because they protected me from any harm, but on the contrary because they did not hide me from the burden of power and responsibility that comes with being a leader. They pushed me to embrace it, to explore how I might do it differently, to discover my own style, and most importantly — to own it.

For the weak manager, this shift of status represents a risk that is far too great for them to consider. The passing of power risks the loss of influence, the reduction of their relevance presents a threat to their hierarchical style of leadership.

For the great leader, however, this presents the chance to create more leaders. They do not fear that they will lose their role, but rather they play the role their team needs them to play, demonstrating their versatility and ability to adapt and only stepping in as the team requires.

Learning which role your team needs you to play.

This concept of role playing is one I’ve been exploring recently having been introduced to David Kantor’s ‘action stances’ during a wonderful leadership session with Dr Karen Morley.

Kantor explores the way people engage in discussions when making decisions, and asserts that ‘every conversation is made up of individual acts of speech: statements and questions…and that every speech can take four types of actions (to move, oppose, follow, or bystand).’

Are you You? Or are You who you were programmed to be?

  • How actually did You become the You, you are today?

When did that process, that programming,  start?

What specifically was the process involved?

We learn scripts, patterns and beliefs as we grow from a baby, we ‘load’ the program.

Is the ‘program’ You are running (subconsciously) today, serving you well in all facets of your life?

This video from Dr Bruce Lipton gives some insight. It is 13 minutes long and well worth the watch.

  • Having watched the video – any ‘program changes’ You can make, new beliefs You can adopt?

We can change Beliefs, as Bruce says, in two main ways:

  • By invoking the ‘Hypnotic’ state of our mind that we have in the first seven years of our life.
  • By Repetition – its how we learned to drive for example, or perhaps learned to play an instrument if we start a little later in life than seven years old. We REPEAT and REPEAT  and REPEAT. The brain learns by repetition.

What will you change?

What will Be-real in your life?
What you Be-lieve

The everyday martial art of talking to someone who disagrees with you: Verbal Aikido, how might that help?

The everyday martial art of talking to someone who disagrees with you Article by Don Johnson

Words create our reality. Once we put them out there, we can’t take them back. Expressions like “I didn’t mean to say that” or “I was only kidding” come too late.

So why do couples get into needless arguments? Jeffery S. Smith, MD, writes in Psychology Today:

The cause of arguments and fights is a lack of mutual, empathic understanding. When empathy is not engaged, then people revert to a self-protective mode and become judgmental. The result is a bad feeling on both sides and no happy ending.

People want to be understood, not just heard.

Author Daniel Kahneman’s theory of two different systems of thinking sheds light on why we sometimes lose the ability to be empathetic in our relationships.

Kahneman says System 1 thinking operates quickly, without concentrated effort. It’s more unconscious, irrational, and emotional. We use it when driving a car on an empty road, reading words on a giant billboard, doing something familiar, or something that looks easy, like solving 6+6=?

System 2, on the other hand, involves effort and attention. It’s logical, rational, and conscious. We use it when solving complicated calculations, adjusting our behavior in a social situation, or when searching for a specific person in a crowd.

When faced with familiar and everyday situations, people invent mental shortcuts. If something looks easy, we use System 1, our more unconscious method of thinking. However, depending solely on System 1 can lead to biases toward everyday situations and issues.

This may explain one of the challenges of being in a relationship: We get used to our partner’s thought patterns and behavior; they become familiar and almost predictable. Consequently, it’s easy to go on autopilot and default to System 1 thinking, particularly when we get triggered, frustrated, or stressed. When we’re emotional, we are more apt to make assumptions, jump to conclusions, get defensive, and not listen attentively. Empathy can slip right through our fingers.

 

Here are some strategies that can help you stay out of unnecessary arguments.

Speak with humility

While a lack of empathy may be the underlying cause of arguments, the words we use are the delivery system. An opinion presented as a fact is toxic and a surefire way to make someone defensive.

Here are some examples of toxic opinions:

  • You’re wrong.
  • That’s stupid.
  • You aren’t thinking clearly.
  • You shouldn’t have done that.
  • You always do that.

Contrast those with these:

  • I don’t understand.
  • I disagree.
  • I feel annoyed.
  • I prefer something different.
  • I have a concern.

These “I” statements are examples of owning your opinion, a critical element of humility.

It only takes one conscious person to stop an argument.

Opinions are subjective and, when expressed in the first person, constructive. They invite differing viewpoints, laying the foundation for resolving conflict. Using language in the second or third person, by contrast, closes off dialogue and invites defensiveness.

Speaking with humility will cool a conversation that’s getting too hot.

Actively listen

Be present: We’ve all experienced the disappointment of speaking to someone who is clearly busy or distracted and says, “Go ahead, I’m listening.” It feels disrespectful and can derail a conversation quickly. Be fully attentive and look at the person you are speaking to.

Be quiet: If you are aware that you interrupt people, stop doing it. It’s a good sign that, whether you realize it or not, you aren’t listening. It conveys that you are more interested in getting your point across than anything else.

Demonstrate your presence: If you sit silently, like a statue, no one knows whether you’re actually listening. Nodding gently, saying “Mm-hmm” or “Uh-huh” will help encourage the other person to explain themselves fully. Silent attention only makes people wonder if anyone is home.

Get curious: Questions show interest and help the other person feel valued. In The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, author Stephen Covey writes, “Seek first to understand, then to be understood.” When something doesn’t make sense to you or you start to feel agitated, ask yourself: What don’t I know? Is there something I am missing? What am I curious about?

Use reflective listening: Summarize what you think you have heard and check to make sure you have it right. “Here’s what I hear you saying and what is important to you… is this correct?” If you don’t have it right, you can try again. You aren’t agreeing—you are just demonstrating you understand.

If you don’t understand, say, “I’m not clear,” or “Help me out. I’m not getting it. It’s counterproductive to say, “You are not making sense.” This creates more defensiveness and blames the other person.

Verbal aikido

Aikido is a modern Japanese martial art that uses the principles of nonresistance to neutralize an opponent. Translated to English, it means “the way of harmonious spirit.” Aikido does not offer aggressive or defensive maneuvers but instead uses the energy of an opponent to divert and redirect an attack harmlessly. The philosophy is based on peaceful resolution and self-improvement. It only takes one conscious person to stop an argument.

Arguments are like two people physically pushing on the other. One pushes; the other pushes back. Then the other pushes back harder. Nothing is accomplished, and everybody feels bad. Verbal aikido uses these principles in defusing conflicts and can help both individuals rekindle empathy.

Let’s imagine my wife and I are arguing. She says, “That’s a dumb idea; it won’t work.” If I say, “You’re wrong,” I’m just pushing back on her, creating more friction. If I agree with her, but don’t mean it, I’m not being truthful, and I’ll wind up being resentful.

Verbal aikido, however, can help stop the “pushing.” Here’s how it works:

Yield. I can defuse the situation by acknowledging her point of view, reframing it slightly to help her recognize and own her opinion. I don’t say anything aggressive or defensive, but I might say, “You think it’s a dumb idea.” Helping her take ownership of the opinion, presented as a fact, is the first step in redirecting the verbal attack.

Inquire. Assuming she says, “Yes, I do think it’s a dumb idea,” I can say, “Okay, help me understand why you think it’s dumb?” I want to invite her to share not just what she thinks, but why she thinks that way. I’m curious to understand her thinking and perspective.

Share. Then, I explain why I think the way that I do. “I think it’s a good idea because…” This creates balance in the conversation and opens up a discussion not just about our opinions but about what is behind them. Arguments are solved through dialogue.

Resolve. As we talk more, if she offers convincing ideas, I can change my mind. If I still don’t agree, I can say, “Let’s find a solution that works for both of us.” We may compromise and move ahead together, or we may decide to disagree, but at least we understand why we think the way we do, and that is a better outcome than arguing.

Arguments are inevitable in life, but by being mindful and skillful, we can speak wisely, listen actively, and bring empathy and love into our conversations — even the tough ones.

  • How would relationships change if we all used Verbal Aikido?