Can you put it in a wheelbarrow?

                                                      language meta model

The above figure shows how we use language, viz. we have an experience and create an internal representation of sensory information which is stored eventually in deep memory. As we recall the memory and bring it to conscious mind in order to speak about it, some interesting things happen.
We nominalise, delete, distort and generalise . See below:-

Nominalisation a common form of distortion
• The communication in this company is atrocious
o How could we communicate more effectively?
• They need my decision by Monday
o When will you decide?
Note: nominalization is when we make a verb into a noun and remove the doing or action. There is a simple test for nominalization, if you cannot put it in a wheelbarrow, then it is a nominalisation, in the above examples you cannot put communication or decision in a wheelbarrow even although you could put a piece of paper with what had been communicated or what the decision was, written on it.

Deletion
• I am afraid
o What specifically are you afraid of?
• She is a better driver
o Better than whom?
• I like her
o What do like about her?
Distortion (mind-reading)
• Susan has no regard for my opinion
o How do you know?
• He’ll be compelled to act
o What gives you that impression?
• You’ve lost all respect for me
o What leads you to that view ?
Generalisation
• I am never mistaken
o You have never ever made a mistake?
• Everybody thinks like that
o Everybody? Everybody in the whole world?
• Nobody takes me seriously
o Not one single person in the whole world ?

Reasons  to know about this are:-
• Sometimes how we use language, clouds understanding of a specific situation.
• It provides an easy way to get someone, especially you, to think a little more about a situation
• It will provoke new ways of thinking

What is this about?
This is to do with how the brain uses language to build its ‘maps’ and how people create faulty mental maps of reality, failing to test their linguistic / cognitive models against the experience of their senses.

How can we use this insight?
First thing is to notice. Use  the observer to catch yourself using these linguistic devices and then ask yourself an appropriate question e.g. you say or think ‘nobody takes me seriously’ . then ask ‘ what nobody? Nobody at all anywhere ever? In the whole wide world, there is nobody that takes me seriously?’ I’m sure you can come up with one or two that do. What this does, is give a truer perspective and probably something better to build beliefs on. Use the insight also, to gently catch others when they use the devices, to help them maintain a ‘truer’ possibly better balanced view.

When you observe, which of the four do you use most:-

  • Nominalise?
  • Delete?
  • Distort?
  • Generalise?

What happens when you ‘correct’ and gain a truer, more balanced  perspective?

How does the Brain represent Reality part 1?

Figure 1 vakog

What are representational systems? See also part 2

Put another way, how does the brain re-present reality? (This entry is from the teachings of NLP).
The reasons you’d want to know about this are:-
• Your preferred system affects how you understand the ‘world’ out there
• We don’t all have the same preference and therefore do not all have the same ways of describing or talking about reality.
• Once you know your preference, you can exploit its strengths and begin to become more flexible by exploring other representational systems
What is this about?
A useful way to think about representational systems is; we experience the world through our five (or maybe there are six 🙂 ) senses, i.e. we see (visual), hear (auditory), feel (kinesthetic) smell (olfactory), taste (gustatory) and maybe we could include having a sixth sense (intuit). I will refer to the five using the acronym  (vakog). Let me take gustatory as an example. When you have a meal you obviously taste the food and this strongly involves your sense of smell, (olfactory). The other senses are also involved of course, we see the food (visual), we feel the textures (kinesthetic) and we hear (auditory) and this is maybe more subtle, the sounds of cutlery, conversation, maybe background noise in a restaurant. Etc. Thus there is a whole experience laid down as a set of patterns in our brains, driven by each of the five senses. This is an important notion here, that as we experience life ‘out there’, we lay down patterns internally, to represent the experience, using our five senses to drive that, see Figure 1 vakog

I trained in NLP back in 1996, with John Seymour, here he is explaining about Visual Auditory and Kinesthetic

If we now, let’s say, sometime after the meal, want to remember the experience then it is as if we relive the experience internally, triggering each of the senses. As an example let me ask you to think about cutting a lemon in half, removing the pips, then biting into the flesh, you can feel your mouth salivating now, at the expected sourness to come.

What am I saying here?
• We experience the world through our senses
• That experience is laid down as patterns in our brains
. We represent what is out there, internally in our minds
• We can ‘relive’ the experience by recalling the pattern / representation
It may or may not surprise you to know that when we lay down and recall memories we have a preferred system for doing that. The visual, auditory and kinesthetic are the primary systems used in most western cultures. Olfactory and gustatory are minor and usually lumped with kinesthetic. Another fact that may help you, is to know that our learning styles are closely aligned with visual, auditory and kinesthetic.

Think about the way you learn best.

  • By seeing pictures?
  • By listening?
  • By direct experience?